Newspapers have been own worst enemies

James Lee, senior VP and chief public affairs officer at ChoicePoint, spoke at the PRSA International Conference today about ChoicePoint’s experience with the theft of 145,000 customer records in 2005.

It was an interesting study in crisis management, but what stuck me the most was comments by him and the audience about their lousy experiences with reporters. Examples:

  • The Atlanta Journal-Constitution ran a story four days after news of the theft broke that claimed that ChoicePoint’s CEO was hiding from the media. In fact, Lee said, the CEO had been unusually open to the media, compared to executives at other companies in that situation. He had given several media interviews, but was unavailable when the Journal-Constitution reporter called. The paper’s story was the only one to accuse the CEO of evasiveness.
  • ChoicePoint wanted to make a careful distinction between theft of data and a hack, because the latter term implies a computer security vulnerability. This is an important distinction to investors and regulators. However, one west coast newspaper had a policy of referring to all information thefts as “hacks,” regardless of the nature of the breach. This made ChoicePoint’s problem look worse than it really was.
  • Pressure to file on deadline forces reporters to seek opinion instead of facts because opinion is easier to get. “In the real world, it takes time to find facts,” Lee said. “If you don’t have facts immediately, they’ll find some [pundit] with an opinion.” Early impressions tend to stick, which means that subsequent facts are buried or ignored.
  • Media outlets throw business stories to inexperience reporters, who don’t understand the fine points of an often complex story and need to be educated under deadline, leading to errors and misunderstanding.
  • News outlets nearly always stick by their story, even when the evidence is overwhelming that they’re wrong.
  • These problems are only getting worse as newsrooms cut staff and competition compresses deadlines.

PR people have to deal with the media constantly and so are more likely to have gripes with the media, but the level of frustration surprised me, nevertheless. This is one reason mainstream media gets so little sympathy for its current woes. Years of arrogance have left it with very few friends at a time when it could use a few.

Our latest podcasts focus on social media marketing

The Tech PR War Stories podcast, episodes 15 and 16, are about the future of marketing with social media. In episode 15, we talk to Brian Solis, a PR executive who has been writing the PR 2.0 blog and who recently authored a social media manifesto that nicely pulls these technologies together.

In episode 16, our guest is Maggie Fox, founding partner of Social Media Group. The year-old firm is exclusively devoted to helping businesses use social media platforms and has had some remarkable early successes.

Both of our speakers are clued in to the potential of social media marketing, but both understand the difficulty of selling new ideas to top management. They offer advice on the benefits of embracing these new tools and how to get your clients and managers on board.

Tech PR War Stories 14: Are CMP layoffs the death knell for IT print media?

This week in the Tech PR War Stories podcast, David and I reflect on upheaval at CMP, which laid off 20% of its workforce last week and shuttered some print publications. I suggest that this is the beginning of the end of print publishing in the IT media market and note that the economics of online publishing in that area are now weighted toward using freelance and blogger contributors instead of full-time staff.

David points out that technology companies are becoming more aggressive about launching their own online and even print publications, and that some of the senior editors who have lost their jobs in IT media will move over to work for vendors. We agree that these custom publishing operations are legitimate targets for PR people to place their clients. Now that everyone can publish easily to the Web, the definition of a “media company” is becoming fuzzier.

In Cheers & Jeers, I praise Oovoo, a new videoconferencing service that sent customized video messages to journalists and bloggers as part of its launch campaign. My jeer goes to Dell Computer, which sent a cease-and-desist notice to Consumerist.com, an action that ultimately backfired on Dell. But at least Dell was contrite in blogging about the mistake and even linking to underground photos of unannounced Dell products. My, how times have changed!

Listen to the podcast here (right click to download): 15:05

Tech PR War Stories Episode 11: our guest is Sam Whitmore

Sam Whitmore’s Media Survey is one of the most influential publications in the high-tech PR community, and David Strom and I were fortunate to have Sam himself as a guest on Tech PR War Stories this week.

We asked Sam to talk about the up-and-coming influencers in IT media and his response surprised me. He’s evidently looking at media that tap into the real issues that IT pros wrestle with week-to-week more than new publishers and editors. He also had a lot to say about the ethos of the blogosphere and how PR pros should work with this new class of journalist. Bottom line: deal with it. These are the new journalists and their ethics and practices aren’t all that different from the folks you’ve dealt with for years.

Good stuff from a thought leader who pulls no punches.

Front page of the Merc

In The New Influencers, I wrote about the TechCrunch blog and suggested that it may have more influence in Silicon Valley than the San Jose Mercury News. Fortunately, the editors at the business section of the Merc overlooked that aside when they chose to feature Dean Takahashi’s column about the book on the front page of the May 17 business section. I’m grateful to Dean and to the newspaper, which is THE paper of record in Silicon Valley.

The day this feature appeared, New Influencers jumped into the top 1,200 titles on Amazon. It’s slipped since then, but the sales rating stayed within the top 10,000 for 10 days. Hopefully, this will get some other people reading and talking about the book.

Interestingly, this is the first time I’ve had a photo published in a major newspaper (the shot of Peter Rojas is mine). Unfortunately, the photo ran with a credit to the book publisher, not the photographer. Ah, well. Such is life. :-)

(Click on the photo to get a larger image)

Our podcast interview with David Meerman Scott

This week in Tech PR War Stories, David Strom and I chat with David Meerman Scott, author of the forthcoming book The New Rules of Marketing and PR, which is due out any day now. David talks about the ideas that got him elected to Marketing Sherpa’s Viral Marketing Hall of Fame two years running, as well as his call for PR people to get a clue about search and start writing press releases using terms buyers care about rather than words they think the media wants to hear.

This will be a two-part interview, with the second running next week. And we barely scratched the surface of what’s in David’s book. Download the podcast. It’s free!

Tech PR War Stories 8 is about "off the record"

What exactly does “off the record” mean? To trained journalists, the meaning of that phrase is simple: you can’t use this information in any way, shape or form. But to many marketers, business execs and even some reporters, the term is interpreted differently. This confusion can create misunderstanding and embarrassment.

In Tech PR War Stories episode 8, David Strom and I discuss the distinctions between “off the record,” “not for attribution,” “on background” and other types of digressions. We also give our quick takes on some recent breaking news in medialand.

We Regret the Error

This week in the Tech PR War Stories podcast, David Strom and I talk about corrections. You don’t really need corrections online because you can just fix the original story. But maybe corrections are still important as an admission of error. Do we still need them?

Our jumping-off point is last week’s dust-up between Steve Rubel and Jim Louderback. Services like Twitter have lowered the barrier to putting your foot in your mouth, and Steve found out the hard way what problems an offhand comment can cause.

The show notes and download page is here.

PR pros should steer clear of sensationalizing

PR practitioners know that research is a great way to get visibility for your clients. However, sensationalizing results is a bad idea.

Techworld writes that Blogs Now Infested With Offensive Content, based on data from Scansafe’s Monthly Global Threat Report for March. This worried me until I read, “To be added to the list of those deemed potentially offensive within a business context, a site merely had to contain a single post containing profanity, or worse.” In other words, “offensive content” is defined as a single mention of the F-word.

Excuse me? Since when is mild swearing considered “offensive?” Blogs are all about expressing personal opinion, and the inclusion of an occasional expletive is part of the process of self-expression. When used carefully, profanity can actually be very effective in making a point. Under Scansafe’s definition, Catcher in the Rye would be deemed offensive.

This is a non-story, and it’s a black eye for Scansafe because the company tried to make it a story. Don’t follow its lead.

Tech PR War Stories Episode 2 is live

The second episode of Tech PR War Stories is live.

David joins us this week from a Microsoft developer’s conference. Some attendees are complaining about how Microsoft treats them, and they’re blogging openly about it. Paul and David discuss the issue of openness and the emerging PR paradigm of embracing the bad with the good. What’s important is the conversation, they agree, not controlling the message.

Thanks for all your comments. Please keep ‘em coming!