{"id":204,"date":"2006-11-21T17:03:00","date_gmt":"2006-11-22T00:03:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/paulgillin.com\/2006\/11\/the-vastly-superior-economics-of-web-20-publishing.html"},"modified":"2006-11-21T17:03:00","modified_gmt":"2006-11-22T00:03:00","slug":"the-vastly-superior-economics-of-web-20-publishing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gillin.com\/blog\/2006\/11\/the-vastly-superior-economics-of-web-20-publishing\/","title":{"rendered":"The vastly superior economics of Web 2.0 publishing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Having talked about the inefficiencies of the existing newspaper model, let\u2019s look at the economics of what\u2019s emerging in the Web 2.0 world.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">A recent <a href=\"https:\/\/cnnmoney.printthis.clickability.com\/pt\/cpt?action=cpt&#038;title=Business+2.0:+Blogging+for+Dollars+-+September+1,+2006&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;expire=-1&#038;urlID=19233546&amp;fb=Y&#038;url=https:\/\/money.cnn.com\/magazines\/business2\/business2_archive\/2006\/09\/01\/83843\">story in Business 2.0 magazine<\/a> revealed the income of some popular bloggers. Read this article if you want to understand the emerging economics of blogosphere. They are vastly more efficient than conventional media. Michael Arrington is pulling in $60,000 a month writing <a href=\"https:\/\/www.techcrunch.com\/\">TechCrunch<\/a>. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.boingboing.net\/\">BoingBoing.net<\/a> is on target to gross more than $1 million. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fark.com\/\">Fark.com<\/a> founder Drew Curtis says he\u2019s on track to soon log sales of $600,000 to $800,000 <i style=\"\">per month<\/i>. <\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\u201cBlogs today benefit from what might be termed uneconomies of scale,\u201d the Business 2.0 article says. \u201cThey are so cheap to create and operate that a lone blogger or a small team can, with the ever-expanding reach of the Internet, amass vast audiences and generate levels of profit on a per-employee basis that traditional media companies can only fantasize about.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Take the Fark.com example. The site generates 40 million page views a month with a staff of one full-time person and two contractors. Its only real operating costs are bandwidth charges. It produces almost no original content and has no capital costs. Members contribute their own content, so no editors are needed. The site almost runs itself. Yet this could approach $10 million in revenue before long. <\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Craigslist.org is another example. This is the fifth most popular site on the Internet, with global reach and an estimated four <i style=\"\">billion <\/i>page views a month. It is absolutely killing the newspaper classified ad business. I read one estimate that Craigslist had cost <st1:city><st1:place>San Francisco<\/st1:place><\/st1:city> newspapers $70 million in revenue in just one year. The entire staff is 23 people.<a onblur=\"try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}\" href=\"https:\/\/www.paulgillin.com\/uploaded_images\/digg_traffic-737414.jpg\"><img style=\"margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 409px; height: 233px;\" src=\"https:\/\/www.paulgillin.com\/uploaded_images\/digg_traffic-734581.jpg\" alt=\"\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a><o:p><\/o:p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">There are plenty of other examples. BoingBoing.net is maintained by five contributors, all of whom work on it part-time. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.outer-court.com\/\">Google Blogoscoped<\/a>, which is the best independent source of information about Google, is run by one person in his spare time. It\u2019s averaging four million page views a month. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gizmodo.com\/\">Gizmodo<\/a> grew to become one of the top five blogs on the Internet with only a single contributor. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.digg.com\/\">Digg.com<\/a>, which is barely two years old, is already among the top 25 sites on the Web. Its traffic outstrips all the largest media sites. It has a staff of 15. <\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">None of these sites is making piles of money yet, but I think that\u2019s only a matter of time. Companies like John Battelle\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fmpub.net\/\">Federated Media<\/a> and Nick Denton\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gawker.com\/\">Gawker Media<\/a> are figuring out the business side. And it\u2019s not like these blogs have to make a lot of money to keep going. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.adrants.com\/\">Adrants<\/a> generates over $100,000 a year in advertising and that\u2019s plenty to keep Steve Hall plugging away at his one-man operation. He\u2019s getting paid to do something he\u2019s passionate about. <\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">How do these sites generate so much traffic at such low cost? They outsource everything.<\/p>\n<ul style=\"margin-top: 0in;\" type=\"disc\">\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"\">Editorial      content is outsourced to an army of individual enthusiasts and bloggers      who find interesting information on the Web and feed it to the site      operators. Editorial expenses, which account for about a third of the      operating costs of a daily newspaper, are practically zero.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul style=\"margin-top: 0in;\" type=\"disc\">\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"\">Circulation      is outsourced to Google and links from other sites. In fact, there really      is no concept of circulation in social media because there\u2019s no way to      \u201cown\u201d the reader. This is a very different model from conventional      publishing, which relies heavily on subscriber lists to validate      advertising rates. The Web approach is much less controllable but also      much cheaper.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul style=\"margin-top: 0in;\" type=\"disc\">\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"\">Production      is outsourced to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.typepad.com\/\">Typepad<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.blogger.com\/\">Blogger<\/a> or any number of other hosted      services at minimal cost. There\u2019s no need for designers because everything      is templated. Some sites practically run themselves. Bandwidth costs can      be steep for popular properties, but that\u2019s true for newspaper websites as      well.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul style=\"margin-top: 0in;\" type=\"disc\">\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"\">Sales      is outsourced to Google Adwords, Federated Media or other sales agents.      This may change in time, but for now, most Web 2.0 companies can\u2019t be      bothered with a captive sales force.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p> <\/o:p>Marketing      and promotion aren\u2019t even done. In the new Web, your marketing is your      content. People either link to you or they don\u2019t. This creates a lot of      pressure on the site operators to be fresh and innovative, but that\u2019s not      a bad thing, really. <\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><o:p><\/o:p>This is a new media model. Its economics are vastly more efficient than mainstream media\u2019s. In the next post, I\u2019ll look ahead to what I think will happen next.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Having talked about the inefficiencies of the existing newspaper model, let\u2019s look at the economics of what\u2019s emerging in the Web 2.0 world. A recent story in Business 2.0 magazine revealed the income of some popular bloggers. Read this article &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/gillin.com\/blog\/2006\/11\/the-vastly-superior-economics-of-web-20-publishing\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":""},"categories":[17,29],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pTy95-3i","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gillin.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gillin.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gillin.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gillin.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gillin.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=204"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/gillin.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gillin.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=204"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gillin.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=204"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gillin.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=204"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}