Like it Matters has posted a brief survey asking marketers to talk about how they monitor the blogosphere and what they do when mentions of their companies show up. I’ll look forward to seeing the results.

A story in Sunday’s New York Times highlights how much today’s teens and young adults are influenced by the Internet. Factoid: nearly 80 percent of under-28 online users regularly visiting blogs, compared with just 30 percent of adults 29 to 40. Says one 24-year-old website editor, “It’s like, if you don’t check your e-mail and you turn off your phone, it’s almost like you don’t exist.” You gotta get with this program if you’re going to influence this next generation of consumers and business people.

I just met with the CEO of a company called iUpload which, despite its diminutive (25 people) size, has big ideas about applying blogs to customer relations.

iUpload is a content management company that has evolved its strategy into the blogosphere. The company is basically a blog hoster, but it has a rich administration system that enables customers to manage and consolidate blogs in creative ways.

For example, you can set up a branded blog under your own company’s name and give publishing access to employees and business partners. Each blogger can maintain his or her own blog on your site with complete control over their own content. But then – and this is where it gets interesting – you can set up mechanisms to grab content from individual sites and aggregate it into portals, front pages or metablogs.

For example, you could aggregate blog entries from the HR and payroll departments into an employee portal that tells people about promotions or benefits changes. A partner portal could be aggregated from blog entries by your product management and channel marketing people. And a public website could be assembled from contributions from all over the company: marketing, product development, sales, executive, press, etc.

Here’s what one iUpload customer, Northwest Voice, is doing. It’s basically a newspaper composed of blog entries. Anyone in the community is eligible to have a blog at Northwest Voice. A person can blog about the school board meeting and the editors can then choose to take all or part of that entry and integrate it into the Northwest Voice site. Teachers can routinely post homework assignments as blogs. But maybe once in a while they want to tell the town about a class project. That’s as simple as notifying the site editor of a new blog entry.

Multiple entries about the same event can be integrated. You could have a report on the city council meeting composed from entries by six bloggers who were there. Classrooms, town government offices and businesses can all have blogs and can all submit content for use on the Northwest Voice site. This is pure community journalism.

Advertisers can use the same mechanism to customize their ads. If you’re discounting haircuts by 10% this Thursday, you just post a blog entry and link to it from your ad. This is really powerful stuff.

Canadian Idol uses iUpload to maintain 40,000 fan blogs for the popular TV show. McDonald’s is a recent new customer. The restaurant chain is going to launch internal blogs worldwide and plans to recruit selected customers to blog about their McDonald’s experiences – both good and bad – for public consumption. Essentially, McDonald’s will recruit customers to be quality control watchdogs and give them a forum for rapidly sharing their experiences.

That’s scary stuff if you don’t have the corporate transparency gene. But if you’re bold enough to listen to unfiltered customer feedback, it’s very exciting. iUpload is on to something here. The concept of integrating customers and constituents into your internal and external communications is full of potential. We’ve barely even scratched the surface.

I haven’t been on hiatus, just incredibly busy. Restructured my web site, launched a newsletter and added a new page to my business site called The Marketer’s blog list. It’s a constantly updated compendium of interesting articles and resources for companies that are considering business blogging or podcasting. Please check it out and give me some feedback!

A lot of services have sprung up recently to help you organize your notes and favorite links. Among them are deli.cio.us, wink.com and RawSugar.com. They’re worth checking out because they let you see link lists from people with interests that are similar to yours and so facilitate a kind of social networking through lists.

But the coolest tool I’ve seen so far is eSnips from Net Snippets, Ltd. This services gives you a generous 1GB of server disk space and a browser toolbar that you can use to clip and organize anything you find on the Web. You can upload anything from simple links to entire Web pages with a couple of clicks. You can also upload files. Everything is stored in folders which can be kept private, shared with selected friends or published on the Web. Here’s a folder I’m putting together on fun and offbeat stuff. Visitors to your public folders can rate the content and add comments.

ESnips is still in beta, is buggy and has some user interface shortcomings but it has quickly become an indispensable research tool for me. As I read articles or find websites on topics that interest me, I drop them into the relevant eSnips folder for later retrieval. When I’m ready to put together an article or chapter, I can revisit everything I’ve found in one convenient place. And the generous disk allocation allows me to store photos, PowerPoint files and other items that I may need to retrieve when I’m not at my own computer.

It’s free. If you’re an information junkie, try it.

Former Lotus CEO Jim Manzi is a man I respect very much, so when he takes an investment stake in something, I think it’s worth listening. Manzi and ex-U.S. Senator Bill Bradley are both investing in Gather.com, a Boston-area startup that aims to build a blog community by paying the contributors. It also has an eBay-like ratings model that lets readers vote on their favorite bloggers. I guess the idea is that the top rated bloggers get more traffic and therefore more money. All the dollars come from advertising.

Manzi posts on Gather about how the company’s business model could challenge what he called the “literary industrial complex,” which is his sardonic term for the big media companies. Manzi has never much cared for the press, so it’s not surprising to see him investing in something that pokes a stick in their eye. It’s a literate, if somewhat wordy essay and you can see how a concept like Gather could work.

I don’t know if it will work, of course, but it’s good to see investment capital continuing to flow into companies that are trying to structure the blogosphere. Chaos is social media’s biggest enemy. These media will achieve its potential only if trusted voices emerge and selected bloggers begin to have an impact. Otherwise, it’s just a lot of people shouting.

I spent the morning at a Massachusetts Technology Leadership Council session called “Sales & Marketing Roundtable: New Online Strategies.” The focus was on social and community media and how it can be used in marketing. Bottom line: you should be at least paying attention to and probably participating in this world.

Here are some highlights from speakers Todd Van Hoosear, chief blogger at Topaz Partners and Julie Woods, VP of product strategy at Cymfony, a vendor of market insight services:

• Great stats from Van Hoosear:

• more people now belong to online special interest groups than to professional organizations or clubs;
• over 25 million Americans have sold something online;
• 10% of Internet users read blogs regularly (plenty of room for growth there!);
• in December alone, Wikipedia readers added more than 45,000 entries;
• 59% of CEOs say they find blogs useful for internal communications and 7% are bloggers;
• 83% of corporate execs who blog say their blogs are written or drafted by someone else (hey, give me a call!);
• you can now call an 800 number and create a podcaston Audioblog.com (Thanks for this referral, Todd. Awesome idea!)

• Interesting technologies and governance procedures are emerging to create structure in blogs. We’re moving toward a Personal Information construct, in which content packages are personalized for each user based on his or her interests, behavioral patterns, demographics and choices. For a somewhat chilling animation on where this is headed, see EPIC.

• One person can do a lot of damage online.

• The Internet shifts economics toward the “long tail.” Basically, those are the products, people and issues that are too specialized or small to be addressed by conventional media. Online communities can cost-effectively address the long tail because the economics of online publishing are different. This is why online is a better medium for targeting. Marketers should know this.

• One-to-one has long been held out as the marketer’s Holy Grail. But it should really be many-to-one, where individuals can receive many customized messages. Online communities are a step toward getting to that.

• Companies that don’t engage with the blogosphere because it’s too small are missing the point. While any one blogger may have limited reach, the links between blogs can create large special-interest audiences. And if a prominent blogger picks up a story, it can spread like kudzu.

• Your community media strategy should cover the entire buying cycle. Banner ads are good at creating awareness. Blogs and podcasts become more valuable as the buyer moves closer to a decision. That’s because peer advice is so important at that time. The community also plays an ongoing role in validating and complementing product support. In fact, one of a company’s greatest vulnerabilities to online criticism is in customer support.

• Many, but not all companies should support employee bloggers. You should only do it if transparency and customer engagement are part of your culture. If you start a corporate blog, use it to respond to issues, get ahead of the buzz in the market, dispel inaccuracies and promote your thought leaders.

• DO NOT be argumentative, sell, overreact or make unsupported claims. You’ll shoot yourself in the foot.

• Don’t ignore this stuff. If you type “Cisco” into Google, the fifth result is a user-generated FAQ and the 14th is a blog entry. If you type “Verizon customer service,” the ninth search result is headlined “Verizon Customer Service is a joke.” Not to single out Verizon. A lot of companies would have the same issue.

• Use automated tools to filter and navigate the blogosphere. Freebies include Bloglines, PubSub, BlogPulse, Technorati, Podscope and many others. Cymfony, Intelliseek, BuzzMetrics and others offer sophisticated paid services.

• The Teflon cancer scare of last year is a good example of how a company effectively responded to a problem through online media. “Important Facts about Teflon” helped counter rumors and calm a growing public outcry. Woods showed a nice chart of blog activity that dramatized how DuPont helped manage the reaction.

I’ve gone about a week without posting, which is rare, but I’ve been up to my eyeballs. The best news is that I’m working on a proposal for a book about social media. A couple of people I know in the publishing world are pretty positive on the idea. If it comes through, I’m going to have my head down working on it for a few months.

I had an interesting interview with Darren Paul of NightAgency, a two-year-old advertising firm in New York that specializes in viral marketing and social media. He told me about a campaign they’re doing right now for iTravel, which is an oddly named shoe company. They built a travel site, j3tlag.com, that’s composed almost entirely of travelogs submitted by bloggers. They marketed through link exchanges and e-mail lists, mixed in a contest and some giveaways and the site’s been going gangbusters. Paul said sales of iTravel shoes are up 250%. It’s a cool site (when it’s working; it’s delivering some ghastly mySQL error messages this morning!) and an example of how content-based marketing and social media can work together. In this case, the builders have put together a compelling destination site by tapping the blogosphere for contributions. It’s also given some bloggers a chance to make a little money, which is never a bad thing. On that I’ll blog more later.

As I packed up after a late night and headed for bed early Wednesday morning, I was relieved to hear flash TV news reports that 12 of the 13 miners thought killed in an explosion in Sago, West Virginia had in fact been found alive. Which made it doubly heart-wrenching to awaken six hours later and found out that all but one of the miners was dead.

The reasons for the tragic miscommunication were still a little hazy as of this afternoon but it appears that someone overheard a comment from a member of the rescue crew over a police band channel and misinterpreted it to mean that the miners had been found alive. That information was then communicated to the anxious relatives gathered in a nearby church. The news media assumed the information was correct. The governor chimed in with “Miracles really do happen!” and it was off to the races. It wasn’t till three hours later that the awful truth became known. This despite the fact that the mine’s owner, International Coal Group, knew within 20 minutes that the report was false.

The blogosphere has been all over this story today and there’s little I can add to the excellent analysis posted on John Cole’s Balloon Juice or the account of events posted on Rodger Morrow’s This isn’t writing, it’s typing. But since I’ve been following community journalism so closely, I’ll make a couple of observations.

First, Wikipedia shone on this story. From the first posting at 10:38 p.m. EST on Jan. 2 through nearly 400 updates and revisions during the next 40 hours, the site organized a voluminous amount of background information on the mine, the explosion, the dangers inherent in mining and the controversy surrounding the false rescue reports. The reports were so timely that they challenged anything you could have found in the mainstream media. While Wikipedia editors lacked the access to government officials that CNN and The New York Times had, they reported updates from those news sites within minutes after they were posted. Anyway, it turned out that having access to government officials wasn’t such a great thing in this case after all.

Wikipedia’s history feature, which allows readers to track edits as they are made, gives some fascinating insights into the chronology of the events. A comparison of the posts preceding and immediately following the news that the 12 miners had died is especially poignant. Students of history will no doubt study wiki revision histories of major events like this because they offer insight into how people reacted to events as they unfolded. They are like little snapshots of time, much deeper and more personal than what the media provides. The first draft of history, really.

Wikinews, the experimental news analog to Wikipedia, didn’t come close to providing the level of detail that Wikipedia did, raising the question of whether the smarter course in the future will be to build out news as a spur to Wikipedia rather than a separate site. I also thought that Wikinews’ angle on the story, which stressed the communication problems rather than the death of the 12 miners, was off base. Perhaps community news editing is impractical without an experienced news editor at the helm. I’ve noted this problem in previous posts.

The news media itself turned in a shameful performance on this story. Print, broadcast and online media all scrambled to report the good news that the miners had been saved based on what turned out to be very flimsy evidence. Standard journalistic practice dictates that you confirm any news before going live with it but there is no evidence that that practice was followed in this case since most accounts indicate that the sole source of the erroneous report was one individual with a police scanner. Even The New York Times got taken and several morning newspapers trumpeted the good news about the rescue hours after it had be confirmed that the miners had, in fact, died.

Of course, you would have been hard-pressed today to find much explanation in the mainstream of why so many professional news organizations got this one wrong. Mainly they blamed the governor, the mine owner or people at the scene for leading them down the wrong path. This excuse looked flimsier and flimsier as the day went along and it became clearer how little evidence there was to report the rescue in the first place.

Recent news media debacles, such as 60 Minutes’ reporting on President Bush’s National Guard service based on bogus documents, have raised a lot of questions about the mainstream media’s ability to participate in this more competitive news world. If the response of the leading news organizations to increased competition is to run with more speculative information and flimsier confirmations, then they will continue to drain away their most important asset, which is their credibility.

In the meantime, this was Wikipedia’s finest hour. The site provided fresh, accurate, current information and was a useful backdrop to ongoing coverage. It’s not a leap of faith to see Wikipedia evolving into an information resource that could be every bit as useful as CNN in understanding the context of breaking news.

I spent some time on the phone today with Andy Abramson, a longtime blogger and marketing/PR strategist who coordinated the blogger outreach program for the launch of Nokia’s new N90 video phone. Nokia took an innovative approach toward engaging bloggers in this program. Some 50 influential bloggers were selected to get N90 phones and review packages and 22 have posted reviews so far, which is a remarkable percentage only five weeks into the program.

Abramson outlined some key lessons he learned from working with bloggers:

Choose bloggers carefully – Nokia had hundreds of bloggers to choose from but narrowed the field down to 50 by researching those who were the most prolific writers and who had the largest number of links from the community. Calling this “more art than science,” Abramson said the key is finding people who are passionate, prolific and popular with their peers.

Don’t insult their intelligence – Bloggers know their stuff, so treating them like newbies will blow up in your face. In fact, bloggers generally understand technology better than their counterparts at trade publications, so don’t insult them by talking down to them or following up frequently with empty questions. Give them the equipment and the fact sheets and let them go to work.

Be transparent – Nokia committed early on to publishing a summary of and a link every blog entry about the N90, whether it was good or bad. The company stuck to its promise. The blogger section of its site indexes every blogger entry, regardless of tone.

Be responsive – This is a near-real-time medium and bloggers expect to get quick answers to their questions. Your staff needs to be available nearly 24X7 to handle inquiries. You can’t put people off for a day or two. They won’t tolerate it.

After listening to these critical success factors, it struck me that most of them would apply to any media campaign, not just one aimed at bloggers. Abramson agreed but pointed out that the blogosphere is especially unforgiving since the authors are smart, opinionated and don’t necessarily play by the media rules. In essence, I think he was saying bloggers are a more demanding audience than journalists.

Fancy that.