Recommended reading

If you visit the Amazon page for The New Influencers, you’ll probably find that the Amazon recommendation engine pairs the book with the latest from David Meerman Scott: The New Rules of Marketing and PR. I’ve just finished David’s book (his third) and highly recommend it.

David’s premise is that marketing and PR have been forever changed by the Internet and that marketers who continue to mine traditional channels of influence are missing the boat. He argues persuasively that the new opportunity is to speak directly to customers – without going through intermediaries – and to engage them in mutually satisfying conversations that lead to long-term relationships.

This is the same basic premise of my book, only I focused exclusively on social media tools. David takes more of a macro approach, incorporating press releases, websites and fundamentals of good marketing. The last third of the book is full of useful how-to information, ranging from basics of tagging and podcasting to some excellent advice on how to write for your customers.

The new world of marketing is scary to a lot of people, but that’s because change is scary. In The New Rules, David Meerman Scott outlines an exciting and opportunity-filled landscape that should energize every marketer. You need to read this book.

Me 'n' Scoble on a webcast

I have the pleasure of being a guest on a BtoB Magazine webcast on May 24 on the topic: Beyond the Mainstream: Reaching IT Pros Through Social Media. I’m particularly delighted that Robert Scoble will be the other guest. Scoble’s an IT-pro-turned-cultural-icon and he knows this topic as well as anybody.

The webcast is free and you can sign up here. Please come listen!

Nantucket Conference Day Two: Craigslist's curious success formula

Craigslist.org CEO Jim Buckmaster was interviewed this morning on stage. Craigslist drives a lot of Internet and media companies crazy because it cares to little about profits. Its free classified ads undercut newspapers’ most profitable business and its remarkable growth (it’s one of the top 10 most trafficked sites on the Web with a staff of just 24 people) shows no signs of slowing.

Craigslist is a true social media disruptor. It has leveraged user interactivity and self-publishing to create a service that people love. In staying focused on user needs, it has pummeled its newspaper competitors who have historically offered expensive and slow services. Craigslist’s refusal to live by the almighty buck also makes a stirring example of how a service that keeps its eye on the ball – its users – and experience spectacular success.

The following is a more-or-less verbatim transcript of what Buckmaster said.

On why Craigslist doesn’t have advertising
“We’ve been told by sales people that we could bring in many millions of dollars by adding text ads but our users aren’t asking us for text ads so we don’t have them. Paid search can create a conflict of interest with site search. The better your site search is, the less need there is for paid search.”

On building community
“Something we learned early on is the more we can get out of the way and let users do things for themselves, it sounds lazy but laziness is part of it. The less you have to depend on someone in an office, users are better positioned than staff to serve themselves and help each other. The other thing is following up on feedback. The site has been hammered into shape by millions of requests over 12 years. Everything you see there today is the result of user feedback.”

On the site’s trademark boring text interface
“You might look to a boring interface as a reassuring thing to cling to as you’re looking at some of the outlandish things you see out there. We’re open in letting people use HTML in their postings, almost to a fault. People aren’t looking for the interface to be exciting. They’re looking to it to be fast, reliable and easy to use.”

On preventing inappropriate material from appearing on the site
“We’re approaching 20 million new classifieds per month. The answer (to inappropriate material) has been to let users flag something that’s inappropriate. If enough users flag it, it comes down automatically. Inappropriate ads usually come down within a few minutes. It’s not perfect, but it’s far more effective than a centralized staff could do.”

On a recent lawsuit over classified ad content
“A group of attorneys in Chicago filed a suit, tried to take us to task over a small number of postings they thought ran afoul of fair housing laws. Mostly they wouldn’t strike you as inappropriate. For example, the mention of a church in an ad was said to be discriminatory to people of a particular faith. That suit was dismissed. The group was attacking the law that exonerates service providers from being responsible for the content of their sites. If there wasn’t that law, a lot of sites like MySpace couldn’t function.”

On why the company isn’t more focused on making money
“This is where the descriptions like ‘communist’ and ‘anarchist’ come in. It seems to make no sense to let a site be as useful as possible and pay no attention to the monetary side. But it hasn’t been tempting. We enjoy working at Craigslist. Users like it and we’re not sure what we would do with a big surplus of cash. We’d probably look at ways to give it away.

“We give away at least 1% of revenue, but we haven’t had a chorus of users suggesting that we should run ads to generate funds for charity. People have that money now and they can give it away. We’re not in a position to be an arbiter of where that money should go.”

On keeping the business simple
“We’re in the top 10 companies in traffic with a staff of 24, whereas the other companies on that list have staffs of more than 1,000. Early in the Internet boom, you tried to raise a lot of VC money and invest in esoteric hardware and expensive software. That never appealed to us. We invested in open source software from the beginning. We don’t have sales and marketing. We mainly have engineers. We don’t have meetings. We’re not trying to maximize revenue. When you’re not trying to maximize revenue, it’s surprising how little staff you need.”

On EBay’s 25% ownership stake
“That ownership is from an early shareholder who decided to sell his stake. EBay has been helpful to us in a few areas, like consumer protection. But on a day-to-day basis, there hasn’t been a lot of interaction.”

At this point, audience questions begin

Q: How about cranking it up a little bit? If you went from 24 employees to 50 you could provide better services.
A:
We are planning to hire more tech staff and customer service staff. But we’re not constrained by capital now, so it’s not necessary for us to look for ways to make more money in order to hire people. We’re not looking to become a mid-sized company. We’re happy being a small company.

Q: Do you intend to do anything internationally?
A:
We have sites in 50 countries. They’re in English now but we’re laying the groundwork for multi-language support. For a small company to be prepared to offer support in languages you don’t understand is a big job. We’ve taken the approach we’ve always taken, which is to listen to user requests and when there are enough user requests, you do what they ask.

Q: How do you deal with regulators’ requests for information?
A:
We’re interfacing with regulators on a weekly basis. It runs the gamut from the Secret Service to local law enforcement to the FBI. We try to keep things small and simple internally and we have good external council. Hiring lawyers would be a, and while I’d like to have that, we also want to maintain a small company that people like to work at.

Q: What can companies like ours (entrepreneurial firms) learn from you?
A:
We don’t have meetings. People can work from wherever they are whenever they want. The tech model is built on alpha geek principle. We’re fortunate to have some fairly brilliant technical people. The one aspect of Craigslist that’s behind the scenes is how we manage to run a rapidly growing site with page load times that are among the fastest of any company. Open source is a big part of it.

Q: Who is Craig and what’s his role today?
A:
He splits his time between being a hands-on customer service rep and a variety of media-related roles. In the Bay Area, he’s become a kind of celebrity. He was on a game show, for instance.

Q: Have you ever had to fire anybody?
A:
It’s been more than five years. We had
a rough patch where we had to do layoffs on our small scale. At the height of the bubble, more than 90% of our revenue was coming from dot-com job listings. Those declined by about 95%. By post-9/11, virtually all of the business we had had at the height of the boom was gone. We ended up letting some folks go who seemed to be contributing the least to our performance. That’s the last time that occurred.

Q: Have you ever thought of acquisitions like Angieslist?
A:
You see so many mergers and acquisitions go awry and you rarely see a case where companies are better off after a merger. Plus you spend so much time looking at legal documents, and that’s one of the things I enjoy least about the job.

Q: What are principles of someone who would make a worthy partner?
A:
Probably someone who’d be 100% focused on creating goodness for the end user without being clouded by sharp business interests that would cloud that. The dynamics of the Internet industry are so powerful that companies increasingly have the luxury of choosing a business model where they don’t come in to an adverse position with their customers. That’s been difficult in the past but you can do it now.

Q: Are you worried about competition, especially internationally?
A:
We don’t even look at what other companies are doing. We’re not setting out to conquer the world of achieve any particular market share. We’re just following up on what our users want us to do. We’ve got plenty of things to occupy our thoughts about how to do better by our users. That crowds our thoughts of fighting competition.

Internationally, there are a lot of companies that have copied our model years before we got there. As long as they’re providing the good things that Craigslist tries to provide, we don’t have a problem with that. We try to be there in a the background as an insurance policy in case they try to turn the screws on their customers. We’ll be there if necessary.

Q: If you rolled back the clock to 1999 or 2000, what have you learned?
A:
Our lives have gotten more complicated as the site has gotten bigger. Regulatory scrutiny is something we never had to consider in the past. The fact that it’s such a large marketplace invariably draws “bad guys” like spammers and wire transfer con games. It’s very hard to keep those people at bay. Both spam and scams are easy to avoid if you use the site as it was intended.

Q: What’s on your agenda for this year?
A:
Internationalization is a large project. Also a less clunky geographical dimension to searching and browsing. Each site is an island under its own. Take Massachusetts: we’ve got a separate site for Boston, a separate one for Cape Cod, a separate one for Worcester. It’d be nice if there were a little more flexibility in the geographic vector. And combating spam and scams is an arms race we’ll always be stuck with. The spammers are resourceful people, they’re technically quite competent, they’re making their living exploiting the big sites. Those are the big areas.

Q: If you were running a newspaper, what would you do? They don’t like you so much.
A:
To me, a newspaper’s role is to get high-quality, accurate information in front of readers. Long before I got to Craigslist, I felt that the big newspaper chains had gotten away from that by taking on debt and focusing on how to increase their profit margins. If it was me, I’d try to get back to the principles of how do I serve the role of the Fourth Estate well and keep from falling into this ridiculous war that we’re in. I was very disappointed with how newspapers dropped the ball in avoiding our getting into this war. I love newspapers and I read lots of them, but once you get away from what you’re about, it becomes difficult. You can’t serve Wall Street while you’re also trying to assist the public. If I were to choose, I’d try to serve the public and let the money side take care of itself.

Q: What are your guiding principles?
A:
We have a strong sense of laissez-faire: To each their own between consenting adults as long as you’re being legal and not taking advantage of people. And the philosophy of letting people use the site as they want. You have to comply with legalities, but beyond that, in our minds the moral side is largely subjective and users have a much richer sense of morality than we do and they’re empowered to make decisions about what should be on the site and what shouldn’t.

Q: If your users decided they liked another site better and trickled away, would that be okay?
A:
If were so inept that we couldn’t provide a value proposition that users found important, yeah, I’d probably encourage them to go away.

David Weinberger's presentation available as a podcast

That was fast! Dan Bricklin has already posted a podcast of David Weinberger’s April 24 presentation to the Mass. Technology Leadership Council. The first 30 minutes are a fascinating prepared presentation. The next 80 minutes are a discussion that could have gone on for hours.

Thanks to Alex Howard for tipping me off to the podcast’s availability.


Excited to be going to Nantucket Conference

I’m delighted to have the opportunity to speak at Nantucket Conference, a highly regarded – and very intimate – annual event for top technology executives in New England. I’ll be on an afternoon panel next Thursday, May 3, talking about how social media is changing the practice of marketing. Then I plan to hang out and just listen to the wisdom of some of the smartest tech entrepreneurs in the country.

This is a special conference because the size of the audience is limited and the population of lawyers, accountants and consultants is kept to a minimum. It’s basically an event for business owners, investors and technology wizards. It takes place this year during a mini-boom in venture capital investing. Good timing and always a great program.

BTW, I think they’re accepting applications to attend for a couple of more days. You have to request and invitation on the website.

David Weinberger's comments provoke thought and debate

David Weinberger gave a great talk to the Massachusetts Technology Leadership Council’s Social Media Cluster today. David has great insight about the dynamics of social media. In his role as a scholar, he is free from having to worry about the commercial implications of these phenomena and to focus on the social dynamics they create. His views echo mine in many ways: human beings have lived for a million years in an environment in which information was scarce. Now we’re moving into an age of information abundance, and this will challenge our institutions fundamentally.

Many people, including David, refer to Wikipedia.org as an example of how much things have changed. Encyclopaedia Britannica used to market itself as the comprehensive source of human knowledge. Wikipedia makes no such claims, yet it is far more comprehensive and scalable than anything Britannica ever imagined. Yes, Wikipedia has its faults, but it is at least honest about its shortcomings, and this paradoxically makes it more credible. Ironically, the historical tendency of media and publishing institutions to build an aura of invulnerability around themselves has actually made them less accessible to the audiences. That makes their mistakes all the more glaring. Put another way, the degree to which you define yourself as infallible creates a disproportionately negative backlash when your fallibility is revealed.

This hasn’t ramifications for the future of our information institutions. In the past, people and institutions could define themselves as experts because no one could conveniently challenge their expertise. But we’re moving into a world in which expertise is constantly challenged. In fact, experts can maintain their status only by consistently discussing and defending their expertise. They can no longer claim to be the oracle of information on any topic because other people can access information on that same topic so easily. This means that the role of the expert evolves into more of in an aggregator, pulling together different opinions from different souces and drawing conclusions from them.

This is a dramatically different definition of expertise, and it will be uncomfortable for many people in business, politics and academia. But I agree with David that this is the way the world is going. In an atmosphere in which information is freely available to everyone, the expert can no longer claim to be the final word on anything. He or she must admit to fallibility and derive influence from the ability to assimilate many facts and arrive at the most informed conclusion

My column in Ad Age

Advertising Age published my opinion piece this week talking about the similarities between public relations campaigns of the past and blogger-based marketing campaigns of today.

The techniques you use to influence the influencers really haven’t changed all that much from the tactics that worked with mainstream media. It’s just that the audience has different motivations. Once you understand how to influence these people, you can build a groundswell of favorable opinion that is impossible for the mainstream media to ignore. See examples.

Come hear David Weinberger's social media insights on April 24. It's free!

Last month, I wrote from the New Communications Forum in Las Vegas about a great keynote presentation by David Weinberger. Now here’s a treat: if you are in the New England area, you can hear David speak about the changes that social media are already causing in markets and institutions and all it’ll cost you is a drive to Waltham, MA.

As a co-author of Cluetrain Manifesto, David is one of the fathers of Web 2.0 and he is on the leading edge of thinking about it. His insights about why people blog, podcast and contribute to Wikipedia will amaze and delight you.

Join us on April 24 in Waltham from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. to hear his thoughts. It’s a free service of the Massachusetts Technology Leadership Council. All you have to do is write “guest of Paul Gillin” in the additional registrant’s field.

All the details are here.

Tech PR War Stories # 3 is about loose lips, death threats and the future of print

This week in Tech PR War Stories, David Strom and I talk about the Fred Vogelstein briefing memo and his Wired article. David says Google has become the new reputation management tool. IDG is transforming itself into an online company with the announcement that Infoworld will become a Web-only property. Paul asks whether print even matters in this market any more. And finally, we discuss the lessons learned from threats on Kathy Sierra’s life and how Tim O’Reilly brokered a rapproachment with Chris Locke.

Download the podcast here.

Tech PR War Stories Episode 2 is live

The second episode of Tech PR War Stories is live.

David joins us this week from a Microsoft developer’s conference. Some attendees are complaining about how Microsoft treats them, and they’re blogging openly about it. Paul and David discuss the issue of openness and the emerging PR paradigm of embracing the bad with the good. What’s important is the conversation, they agree, not controlling the message.

Thanks for all your comments. Please keep ’em coming!