Daily Reading 10/7/08

  • The Word of Mouth Marketing Association has come up with a compact and useful set of guidelines for marketing to social media influencers. It’s available for review and comment through Oct. 20, after which it will be published.

    tags: daily_reading

  • Here is a passionate argument for a new form of engagement marketing in which the marketer’s task is to find where the customers are already going and to meet them there. Unlike a lot of social media enthusiasts, Tobaccowala sees a need for conventional as well as conversational marketing. The trick is to achieve a blend that invites interaction that enables customers to market to each other.

    tags: daily_reading

  • More than 20% of US companies have investigated “the exposure of confidential, sensitive or private information via a blog or message board posting in the past 12 months,” according to Forrester Research. Data is leaking out of companies at increasing rates as Web 2.0 tools spread and media becomes more portable.

    tags: daily_reading, security

  • My Podcast partner, David Strom, has some practical insight on the limitations of social networks. The problem of separately work and personal identities is particularly annoying for marketers.

    tags: daily_reading

  • Doug Kaye, the innovator who came up with the IT Conversations podcast site, continues to pursue his goal of capturing important events in audio. What’s “important?” Well, in true Web 2.0 spirit, Doug leaves that in the eye of the beholder. SpokenWord.org is a new effort to catalog all kinds of spoken content.

    tags: daily_reading, podcasting

  • In this fast-paced and hilarious audio keynote from the O’Reilly Open Source Conference, Nat Torkington contrasts the major components of the open source stack to teenage children at various stages of development. It’s 15 minutes well spent.

    tags: daily_reading, open_source

  • Cool maps mashup site that lets you combine two maps; for example, a map of the London underground overlaid on a map of the city of London.

    tags: daily_reading, mashups

  • Sound advice from a blog in India about how to make your story heard amid media noise

    tags: daily_reading, blog_business

Can You Hear Me Now?

A couple of weeks ago I wrote with some satisfaction about my successful conversion from Blogger to WordPress. The new important features in WordPress 2.6.2 are truly impressive, and the Blogger entries and comments came in without a hitch, even down to the permalink names.

I should have known it was too good to be true. I noticed this week that none of my recent entries were showing up in my RSS feed. Checking out the WordPress settings, I discovered that my site didn’t even have an RSS feed. Feed queries were returning a 403 error code, which means a security access violation. Trolling the WordPress message boards turned up that problems like this can only be addressed by the hosting provider, and GoDaddy doesn’t troubleshoot applications.

I tried exporting my blog using WordPress’s wonderful XML export utility. That went fine. The trouble was that the file exceeded the 2MB import limit. I had to scrounge up a way to change that (not a big deal, actually, involving a minor change to php.ini) and test a new install of WordPress and uploading my XML file. That went fine. Ultimately, I ended up uninstalling and reinstalling WordPress and reloading my blog. Then I had to rebuild by sidebar, change the header image and reburn my feed.

Long story short, this consumed a good four to six hours of time between troubleshooting and restoring. Feedburner now says I have a working RSS feed. We’ll see. I’m hoping this item shows up in it, along with the dozen or so other extries that subscribers haven’t seen over the last two weeks.

One of these days I’m going to hire me an IT person!

Corporate Blogs Blather While Markets Tumble

Between checking Marketwatch.com and commiserating with colleagues, it’s safe to say there wasn’t a lot of work getting done this week. Nervous investors flocked to the Web for some sign that the turmoil in the financial markets would soon die down.

With so much attention riveted on the future of the economy, this seems an ideal time for corporations to use their blogs to provide guidance and reassurance, or at least perspective, on the Wall Street meltdown. However, a quick tour of 15 prominent sites demonstrated that they were doing anything but that. Here’s a sampling:

Kodak‘s Thousand Words blog posted photos of Northern California scenery and humpback whales off the coast of New England.

Accenture has a perfectly aligned blog about Accelerating High-Performance Business.  It hasn’t been updated since early July.  There’s also an Accenture blog devoted to advice from experienced consultants.  That one hasn’t been updated in two months.

BenettonTalk took on the topic with its characteristic directness and left-wing advocacy.  It pointed to several articles from people who want to revamp the US financial, transportation and participative government systems.

Boeing is tied up with a strike, so it can perhaps be excused for not addressing bigger economic issues.  Randy’s Journal hasn’t.

Wal-Mart, which is one of the most important companies in America, posted two entries since the crisis began.  One was about its campaign to reduce plastic bag waste and the other clarified its strategy on digital rights management. I suppose that’s more important that the economy in some parallel universe.

Factory activity hit its lowest level in seven years last month. With that as a backdrop, Chrysler chose to devote space to test-driving the Dodge Challenger and a new model of its gas-guzzling RAM 1500 truck. It also posted a video of Chairman Bob Nardelli talking about electrical prototypes.  We can assume everything is just great at Chrysler.

As the Dow fell 777 points on Monday, Delta Airlines posted an item about its sponsorship of the World Business Forum in New York City.  Describing an event that covered “leadership, innovation, the intersection of politics and business, and the challenge of change,” the blog doesn’t say one word about a mounting financial crisis that touches on all those areas.

Give General Motors credit for trying to be topical.  Its September 29 entry presented Chairman Rick Wagoner making a case for government loans to automakers to meet more stringent fuel economy standards.  At least that’s newsworthy.

Johnson & Johnson talked about a visit to BlogWorld and a dinner honoring two esteemed scientists.

Bill Marriott, who is one of the few CEOs who blogs, commented proudly on Marriott’s selection to a list of best places to launch a career and more soberly on a hotel bombing in Pakistan.  Not a word about the outlook for the travel sector.

PriceWaterhouseCoopers has an article by David Phillips about the shortcomings of regulatory reports.  Of all the corporate blogs I checked, this was the only one that addressed the market turmoil directly.

Sony wrote about a charity it supports and the long-term viability of the Blu-Ray disc format.

Southwest Airlines talked about a new approach to speeding up lines at airport security and also a pilot’s experience during a particularly rough landing in Austin.  In 13 entries since September 17, there is only one passing reference to “the current mess on Wall Street.”

Toyota was happy to report that 48% of Lexus owners are repeat customers.  It also boasted about two new crossover vehicles as well as its ongoing work on hybrids.  I guess the US economic crisis is a domestic matter.

Wells Fargo says its Guided by History blog “allows our archivists and historians to provide a rich online experience that bridges events in the past and with an outlook on the future.” You’d think this would be a great time to look at past economic meltdowns for context the current turmoil. You would be wrong. Instead, the entry posted the day after the Dow’s record drop is a travel video.

My point isn’t to ridicule these companies as much as it is to demonstrate how far we still have to go in achieving the culture of openness that new media enables.  Here was an opportunity for some of America’s most respected corporations to offer guidance and thought leadership to frightened consumers.  Instead, most have chosen to serve up the same old happy-talk mush they’ve delivered for years.  That’s their right, but that isn’t leadership.

These are historic times that offer businesses the chance to break through the noise and do something daring and different. So far, corporate America has fumbled the opportunity. Perhaps, as the economic picture becomes clearer, some will start talking with their customers instead of marketing at them. That would be a welcome development. I’ll keep an eye out for you.

New Marketing Podcast

With the New Marketing Summit coming up in less than two weeks, David Meerman Scott (center) and I sat down with Michael Lewis (left) of the Business Marketing Association of Boston to talk about the new marketing landscape. You won’t find a lot of disagreement in this podcast. David and I concur that marketers need to make some fundamental changes to the way they approach their work, but the payoffs are huge in terms of lower cost, better leads and improved customer retention. We offer some good examples of what’s working and also how some companies still just don’t get it. We share stories we’ve picked up from our travels and speaking tours over the last year and look ahead to what attendees at the Summit can expect to learn. 

If you haven’t yet signed up for the event, remember that you get a $200 discount by using code PAULVIP. Go to  New Marketing Summit to register.

Download the podcast (25:00).

Crisis Tests IT’s Influence

From Innovations, a website published by Ziff-Davis Enterprise from mid-2006 to mid-2009. Reprinted by permission.

Between checking retirement portfolios and flipping over to wsj.com or Moneywatch every hour or two, a lot of people aren’t’ getting much work done this week. Who can blame them? Between the unprecedented bankruptcies of some of Wall Street’s biggest firms, the turmoil in the stock market and dire statements from top officials in the U.S. government, it’s easy to believe that the world is caving in.

I’m nervous, too, but I’m also resisting the urge to forecast disaster because I just don’t think the Great Depression can happen again. Part of the reason is information technology.

There are two ways in which IT can make important contributions to pulling the U.S. economy out of chaos: by empowering rapid decisions and enabling communication. As evidence of the first dynamic, look at the chart below. It shows growth in U.S. gross domestic product from 1930 through 2007. You don’t have to squint much to see where the trend has been going. The huge swings in GDP performance that occurred during the Depression and war years have gradually become gentler and more predictable. Negative growth, which was a regular occurrence during much of the 20th century, has only occurred once in the last 25 years. The further right you go on the chart, the more boring economic performance becomes. That’s precisely how businesses like it. Consistency sets the stage for more confident long-term planning.

Technology’s Shadow Role

There are multiple reasons why the economy has stabilized in recent decades; globalization and the Federal Reserve are certainly two of them. But I would suggest that information technology plays a shadow role. Note that the GDP numbers show a clear smoothing trend beginning around the middle 1960s, which was when computers began to make their way into back offices on a grand scale. The trend becomes even more refined in the late 1980s, when PCs started landing on every desktop.

I think it’s no coincidence that economic cycles became less volatile when managers and regulators began deploying sophisticated models to predict the path of business. Even as the economy has been roiled by financial crises, 9/11 and the bursting of the Internet bubble over the last two decades, recessions have tended to be shallow and brief and recoveries have been smoother and more sustained than in previous cycles. One factor may be that economic plays have more sophisticated means to model the impact of their decisions than they did before. That leads to better forecasting and quicker mid-course corrections, which makes for less volatility. No one’s suggesting that we aren’t in for some difficult times, but if the past is any indication, we’re better equipped to pull out of the tailspin today than ever before.

The other potentially positive IT influence on economic cycles is the Internet, and in particular Web 2.0. Within just the last five years, businesses have embraced robust new ways to communicate with their constituencies. As new economic surprises have turned up almost daily over the past few weeks, people have flocked to their Facebook groups, Twittered their concerns and voiced their opinions on news sites like never before. Smart business leaders should be tapping in to these conversations and using them to help guide their own decisions. If you want to learn how your customers are thinking about the latest dose of bad news these days, you need only to ask them or just listen. Trends that used to take months to identify can now be discerned in a few hours. It’s too early to know what the impact this fact will have on economic performance, but it’s likely to encourage faster and more competent decision-making.

Web 2.0 also enables corporate leaders to communicate directly to their constituents to offer own perspectives on unfolding events. Unfortunately, they aren’t doing much of that yet. A quick check of blogs operated by Chrysler, Marriott, McDonald’s, Whole Foods, Accenture, Boeing, Wal-Mart and Southwest Airlines shows that none has yet departed from delivery cheery good-news fare to comment upon the economic issues that weigh most heavily on American minds. Cheers to General Motors and PriceWaterhouseCoopers for attempting to lend some of their perspective to the conversation. I only hope the others are too busy listening at the moment to make time to state their own views. America certainly wants to hear them.

Where are Corporate Bloggers When We Need Them?

Web 2.0 makes it easy for corporate leaders to communicate directly to their constituents, right? So where the hell are they in our hour of need? I quickly checked a sampling of prominent corporate blogs. Chrysler, Marriott, McDonald’s, Whole Foods, Accenture, Boeing, Wal-Mart and Southwest Airlines have yet to say a word about the economic crisis. They’re all still focused on cheery good news. What are they thinking? Cheers to General Motors and PriceWaterhouseCoopers for at least attempting to lend some of their perspective to the conversation. Whether you agree with them or not, they’re talking.

Let’s hope the other guys are too busy listening at the moment to make time to state their own views. We certainly could use their perspective on how THEY plan to react to market turmoil. Why are their so strangely silent?

Tips for Dealing with Online Negativity

I’ve recently counseled some clients who have been struggling with blogger negativity. Their experiences offer lessons in how to deal with this common problem.

Anyone who embarks upon a social media campaign risks opening him- or herself to attack. Even the most noble causes can run afoul of extremists. In the vast majority of cases, these problems can be contained with sufficient planning. The trick is not to get caught flat-footed by criticism you didn’t expect. In fact, when managed professionally, negativity can actually enhance your image by demonstrating that you’ve thought through the issues in detail.

Negativity can usually be anticipated and blunted if you deploy a few basic tactics:

Anticipate. Before launching a blog or public forum, know what you’re getting into. If you have critics, they will use the opportunity to air their gripes. Even if you don’t think you have critics, you should be prepared for them to emerge from unexpected places.

One client chose to blog about his adventures exploring new geographies. He was proud of his efforts and so was completely blindsided when environmentalists began attacking him. Had he thought through his topic more thoroughly, he might have anticipated such criticism.

Most businesses are poorly prepared to anticipate criticism because they only see the good in what they do. Here’s where an outside perspective may help. Come up with all reasonable arguments against your story and prepare a defense for each. It may be worth hiring a domain expert or journalist to help poke holes in your case.

Keep calm. The knee-jerk reaction to criticism is usually “How dare they!”, but reacting defensively rarely works. Critics are inclined to be blunt when they think they’re shouting into an empty well, but they’re more civil when confronting a real person. Use their anger to reinforce your rationality. Count to 100 before responding, maybe take a walk around the block and then consider if there is any validity to the critic’s comments. Conceding that someone has a point — even if you don’t plan to do anything about it — is the fastest way to disarm him. Simply saying that you heard his comments will go miles toward soothing his anger.

If you really want to confound a critic, look up his phone number online (this usually isn’t difficult). Even if you end up leaving a voicemail, the mere act of personalizing an anonymous interaction often heads off a confrontation.

Don’t censor. One client got so flustered by unanticipated negativity that he began deleting critical comments. NEVER DO THIS. Censorship won’t silence your critics; it will only send them to other forums you don’t control. It’s okay to edit obscene or inappropriate remarks, but don’t delete them just because you don’t like what they say. Once you have created a public forum, you must live with the consequences.

A little criticism actually isn’t a bad thing. It makes you look more credible. Respond to adversaries using the tactics outlined above, but don’t use your power to silence them. It will backfire on you.

Address issues, not people. Your most vociferous critics may stoop to character assassination to dramatize their case. Don’t go there. Address issues, but leave the name-calling to the amateurs.

You also don’t have to speak directly to your critics. If people are harping on one issue, post information that addresses several critics. DuPont did this a few years ago when rumors popped up that Teflon caused cancer. DuPont didn’t address its critics directly but instead set up a website to tell the truth about Teflon. By refuting the rumors with scientific evidence, the company quickly put the issue to bed. Bloggers helped out by linking to DuPont’s informational website. The company never got down in the muck with its detractors, but effectively dispatched the rumors with facts.

If you employ these four tactics, you’ll be able to cope with nearly every challenge to your credibility, even the unanticipated ones.

New Marketing Expertise and a Special Discount Price

If you’re anywhere near the New England area, I hope you’ll join me, David Meerman Scott, Chris Brogan, Don Peppers and a host of other new-media marketing practitioners for a two-day forum that’s jam-packed with advice from experts in the latest online disciplines. And here’s a bonus: you get to see the inside of the Gillette Stadium’s fabulous conference facilities overlooking the football field where the New England Patriots play!

The event is the New Marketing Summit, and if you sign up with code PAULVIP, you get a $200 discount off the $795 registration.  Beginning today, you can also use that code to shave $50 off the fee for the Monday evening exhibits reception: That means for a mere $45, you can spend two hours on Oct. 14  perusing the latest new-media marketing tools and enjoying some fine drinks and hors d’oeuvres. Compare to an evening out in Boston; you can barely park for that amount :-).

David, Chris and I have worked closely with the experts at CrossTech Media to craft a program that we think represents the best of new marketing practices. A few highlights:

 

 

There are dozens of speakers, many of them successful practitioners who will tell what’s working for them and how you can benefit from their experience.

I’ll be opening day two of the conference on Oct. 15, speaking on the topic of  Profiting from Engagement: Why Content is the New Currency of Marketing. This represents my latest research and thinking on the market changes that are being brought about by a new breed of empowered customers who use their blogs, Facebook groups, recommendation engines and social shopping sites to define the terms of marketing engagement. Customers now largely control the brand and image of the companies they do business with. Don’t you think you should know all you can about those dynamics?

Please click the button above or the image below to register. That’s the venue for the event. Look me up when you arrive!

 

Gillette Stadium conference facility

Gillette Stadium conference facility

Twitter Coverage of Thought Leadership Seminar

A couple of active Twitterers covered yesterday’s Mass. Technology Leadership Council seminar on How to Use Social Media to Become a Thought Leader. Here’s the stream

Panelists David Vellante, Jeremy Selwyn and John McArthur were enlightening and forthcoming about their experiences and advice. The room was full and the audience asked great questions. Thanks to the panelists, everyone who came and the two Twitterers who provided such thorough coverage!

Innovation From Below

From Innovations, a website published by Ziff-Davis Enterprise from mid-2006 to mid-2009. Reprinted by permission.

On a visit to Compaq Computer (remember them?) several years ago, an executive told me proudly that Compaq had reinvented itself to avoid becoming what he referred to as “the Mercedes of PCs;” in other words, the luxury supplier in a market that was increasingly demanding low cost and high volume.

It turned out that Compaq succumbed to cheaper competition, anyway. It quality-at-all-costs culture couldn’t successfully accommodate the “good enough” demands of the emerging market.

This story came to mind this week as I noted the impending launch of the Tata Nano (below), a new low-cost automobile being introduced next month by India’s giant industrial conglomerate Tata Group. Priced at just $2,500, the Nano is a marvel of simplicity.  At a time when the cheapest American car costs nearly $11,000, it’s a bid to rewrite the economics of the global auto industry in an effort to reach a giant emerging class of consumers.

The Nano is remarkable not for its technological sophistication but for what designers chose to leave out.  For example, the base model has no air conditioning, power brakes or radio.  Even its steering column is constructed of hollowed-out steel to save money on materials and reduce weight.  It has a top speed of just 65 mph from its tiny rear-mounted engine.

Tata made these trade-offs in order to accommodate other needs that it believes are more important to its audience.  Specifically, the Nano can accommodate four passengers while putting around at 50 miles per gallon.  It meets all Indian emission, pollution and safety standards, although admittedly those are looser than in the US.  It’s also designed for modular assembly, meaning that local entrepreneurs can add value by swapping in their own components for those provided by the manufacturer. From its lowest-cost perch, it can easily be scaled up without sacrificing its compelling price advantage.

An Open Source Automobile

The Nano may be the world’s first open-source car.  Tata intentionally chose to design the vehicle around modular components and to single-source most of those parts in order to keep costs down. Modularity also creates an opportunity for innovation in manufacturing, for the Nano is designed to be assembled in small quantities. Entrepreneurs can set up boutique assembly shops to build the vehicles profitably in small quantities for their local markets.  They can plug in the components that their customers value most and still retain significant cost advantage.

This kind of innovation goes against the grain of most American thinking.  In our technology-driven culture, we are wedded to the principle that sophistication and elegance define innovation.  We celebrate product over process and take pride in the number of patents our companies earn.

In contrast to Tata’s bare minimalist approach, American automakers have increasingly been outfitting their vehicles with navigation systems, video entertainment and computerized wizardry encoded in proprietary black-box designs. A high-end DVD entertainment system in an American car costs more than an entire Nano. While there’s no question that these high-tech products are innovative, but they serve a narrow slice of the luxury market that is already saturated with choice.

Tata, in contrast, is focused on volume. It expects to sell over one million Nanos in the first year and to ramp up steeply from there.  It’s targeting the 98 out of every 100 Indians who don’t own a car.  In contrast, the U.S. has 76 vehicles for every 100 citizens.

There’s a lesson here for tech professionals. As I’ve noted before on this blog, disruptive market change almost always comes from below. In computers, consumer electronics, software and even retailing, low-cost providers who unlock new markets invariably displace high-margin boutique businesses at the high end.

Tata is targeting the hundreds of millions of consumers who will constitute the middle class of the future. These people have never owned a car and have no affinity to a brand. Most have also never owned computers, luxury electronics or online bank accounts. They are a green field of opportunity for companies that can meet their need for affordability and convenience. While Tata will no doubt face skeptics and setbacks, it has defined a clear vision and built a company around it.

Is your company positioned to meet this opportunity? Or is it destined to become the Mercedes of your market? Comment below and tell me if you think low-cost markets are an important opportunity to you.